If you have spent much time around preachers, you have probably heard somebody describe themselves as an “expository preacher.” Depending on the room, they may say it as a simple description of how they teach Scripture or with enough confidence to make it sound like every other kind of preaching is spiritually suspicious. Then you hear another pastor preach a deeply biblical message on prayer, grief, marriage, leadership, or faith while moving through several passages of Scripture. That preacher may be using what is commonly called topical preaching, and the sermon may be every bit as faithful to the Bible.
The question, then, is not whether expository preaching is biblical and topical preaching is not. The better question is what each method is designed to do, what can go wrong when it is handled poorly, and how a preacher decides which approach best serves the text and the congregation. Understanding the difference is especially important for developing preachers because the method you choose changes how you study, organize, illustrate, apply, and ultimately deliver the message.
What Is Expository Preaching?
Expository preaching begins with a biblical passage and allows that passage to determine the central message and much of the structure of the sermon. The preacher is not first asking, “What do I want to talk about this Sunday?” The primary question is, “What is this text saying, and how can I faithfully communicate what it says to the people I am called to serve?” That shift in starting point is what gives exposition its distinctive character.
Suppose you are preaching Philippians 4:4-9. You begin by studying the passage itself: what Paul says, why he says it, what is happening in the surrounding argument, which words and ideas repeat, what commands appear, and how the passage moves from one idea to the next. You may discover important themes involving joy, anxiety, prayer, gratitude, peace, thought life, and Christian practice. Those themes are not simply ideas you carried into the passage. They emerge from your study of the text, and your sermon develops from what you found there.
That does not mean an expository sermon must become a running commentary in which the preacher explains every word one at a time. It also does not mean the congregation needs a miniature seminary lecture every Sunday morning. Exposition is better understood as preaching in which the meaning and movement of the biblical text substantially drive the meaning and movement of the sermon. The preacher studies deeply, then communicates clearly enough that ordinary people can understand the truth, see why it matters, and know how to respond.
What Is Topical Preaching?
Topical preaching usually begins somewhere else. Instead of beginning with one primary passage, the preacher begins with a subject, question, problem, doctrine, or pastoral need and then studies what Scripture teaches about it. A topical sermon might address prayer, forgiveness, spiritual gifts, anxiety, financial stewardship, marriage, leadership, grief, discipleship, or another subject that needs careful biblical attention.
Imagine you want to preach a message called “What the Bible Says About Worry.” You might study Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 6, Paul’s instructions in Philippians 4, Peter’s teaching about casting our cares on God, and selected Psalms that describe fear and trust. After studying those passages in their proper contexts, you organize the biblical teaching into a coherent message about worry. In this approach, the topic determines the research question, while Scripture must still determine the answer.
The simplest distinction is therefore this: expository preaching usually begins with a text and asks what that text teaches, while topical preaching usually begins with a subject and asks what Scripture teaches about that subject. Neither starting point gives the preacher permission to mishandle the Bible. In both methods, faithful interpretation still matters.
A Simple Example: Preaching About Fear
Suppose your congregation has experienced a difficult season and you sense that fear needs to be addressed. A topical sermon could begin with fear as the subject and study several passages, such as Psalm 27, Isaiah 41:10, Matthew 6:25-34, Mark 4:35-41, Philippians 4:6-7, and 2 Timothy 1:7. After careful interpretation, you might organize the message around several biblical truths about fear, trust, God’s presence, and faithful action.
An expository approach might instead select Psalm 27 as the primary text. You would study the Psalm’s structure, David’s confidence, the threats around him, his longing for God’s presence, his prayer, and his final call to wait on the Lord. You would still be preaching to people who are dealing with fear, but Psalm 27 would establish the theological path of the sermon. The pastoral issue may be the same, while the sermon-building process is different.
Why Expository Preaching Is So Valuable
One of the strongest arguments for expository preaching is that it disciplines the preacher to deal with what Scripture actually says rather than constantly returning to favorite themes. Every preacher has subjects that come naturally. Some repeatedly preach faith and possibility. Others are drawn toward leadership, relationships, spiritual warfare, justice, holiness, or church growth. Those emphases are not automatically wrong, but over time they can narrow the diet of a congregation if the preacher never allows the broader witness of Scripture to set the agenda.
Preaching through a biblical book can challenge that tendency. If you preach through James, you eventually have to address the tongue, favoritism, suffering, prayer, wealth, works, and wisdom. If you preach through 1 Corinthians, you eventually encounter conflict, sexual morality, spiritual gifts, worship, love, resurrection, and church order. Expository preaching can therefore expand both the preacher’s theological vocabulary and the congregation’s biblical literacy because people learn how arguments, chapters, stories, doctrines, and books fit together rather than hearing only isolated verses.
The Problem With Bad Expository Preaching
Expository preaching can still be ineffective when the preacher confuses explanation with preaching. A sermon may carefully explain verse one, then verse two, then verse three, and continue until everyone knows what the text meant in the first century but no one understands why it matters in their life. That is not a weakness in Scripture. It is a communication problem. People need more than information about the text; they need help recognizing what the truth of the text requires of them today.
Strong exposition usually answers several connected questions: What does the passage say? What does it mean? Why does it matter? What should we believe because of it? What should we do? What needs to change? Explanation without application can feel like a lecture, while application without explanation can become motivational speaking with Bible verses attached. Biblical preaching needs both.
Why Topical Preaching Can Be Powerful
Topical preaching is particularly useful when a congregation needs clear biblical guidance around a specific issue. If a community has just experienced tragedy, the pastor may need to address grief, suffering, hope, or the presence of God rather than continue a planned series without acknowledging what everyone in the room is carrying. The same is true when a church needs concentrated teaching about marriage, finances, parenting, relationships, prayer, leadership, or discipleship.
It is also useful for practical sermon series because a broad theme can be explored from several biblical angles. A series on healthy relationships might include messages on communication, forgiveness, boundaries, marriage, friendship, and family. Each sermon can draw from appropriate passages while remaining connected to the larger pastoral goal. When handled carefully, topical preaching can give a church a broad biblical framework for real questions people are already asking.
The Biggest Danger of Topical Preaching
The danger appears when the preacher decides what the sermon will say before allowing Scripture to speak. It is very easy to choose an idea, search for verses containing the right words, insert those verses into the outline, and call the result biblical. The problem is that Scripture has become decoration rather than authority. This is where proof-texting begins: a verse is removed from its paragraph, book, argument, or historical setting because it sounds useful for the point the preacher already wanted to make.
Faithful topical preaching requires the same interpretive discipline as exposition. Every verse belongs to a context. Every paragraph participates in a larger argument or story. Biblical authors were communicating real ideas to real audiences. A topical sermon is strongest when the preacher studies those passages carefully and allows the combined witness of Scripture to shape the conclusion rather than searching for biblical language to support a predetermined opinion.
Is Expository Preaching More Biblical?
Some pastors believe expository preaching should be the dominant or even exclusive method of preaching, while others regularly move among expository, topical, textual, narrative, and doctrinal approaches. There is a strong case for making exposition a significant part of a church’s preaching life because it keeps the preacher anchored in the text and systematically exposes the congregation to Scripture. Still, a sermon does not become faithful merely because the preacher calls it expository, and it does not become unfaithful merely because the sermon began with a topic.
A preacher can work verse by verse and still misinterpret a passage. A topical preacher can also study every passage carefully, honor its context, represent its teaching accurately, and produce a deeply biblical sermon. The more important evaluation is whether Scripture was handled faithfully, whether the central truth was communicated accurately, whether the congregation could understand it, and whether the application flowed from what the Bible actually teaches.
Can You Combine Expository and Topical Preaching?
Yes, and many strong sermons do exactly that. A pastor may begin with a topical need but choose one primary passage to anchor most of the sermon. Suppose the church needs teaching about anxiety. Philippians 4:4-9 might become the main text, with Matthew 6, 1 Peter 5, and selected Psalms serving as supporting passages. The sermon addresses a topic, but the main text still provides much of the theological and structural weight. This approach is sometimes described as topical exposition and can combine the clarity of a focused subject with the interpretive discipline of a primary passage.
Which Approach Should a Developing Preacher Learn First?
For someone learning how to build sermons, expository preaching is an excellent foundation because it forces you to develop the skills that transfer into nearly every other form of biblical preaching. You learn to observe a text, identify context, find the central idea, recognize natural movements, distinguish explanation from application, and build a sermon structure from biblical material instead of starting with a blank page. Those disciplines make you better even when you later preach a topical or narrative message.
That does not mean you need to begin by preaching Romans verse by verse for three years. Start with a shorter book or a manageable passage. Philippians, James, Ruth, Jonah, Colossians, or 1 Peter can teach you how to follow a biblical author’s movement without creating a sermon series your grandchildren will eventually have to finish. The objective is not to wear the label “expository preacher.” The objective is to become a preacher who can handle Scripture responsibly and communicate it clearly.
Choose the Method That Serves the Message
Preachers sometimes become so attached to a preaching identity that the method begins to control the text. A narrative passage may naturally call for scenes and tension rather than three matching points. A doctrinal issue may require bringing several passages into conversation. A biblical book may invite a sustained expository series. The form should serve the message rather than forcing every sermon into the same mold.
Before choosing your structure, ask what the biblical material requires and what your congregation needs in order to understand it. If you are preaching exposition, let the text establish the message. If you are preaching topically, let Scripture establish the answer. In either case, your responsibility is not simply to have a sermon category. Your responsibility is to communicate the Word of God faithfully, clearly, pastorally, and in a way people can carry into real life.
What to Read Next
If you want to strengthen your expository preaching, the next practical step is learning how to move from a biblical passage to a sermon structure without forcing the text into an artificial outline. Our companion guide, Expository Sermon Outline Template: A Step-by-Step Guide, walks through that process from passage selection and context to the big idea, sermon movements, application, transitions, and conclusion.
Recommended Resources
Biblical Preaching by Haddon W. Robinson: A foundational text on developing expository sermons around one clear big idea.
Christ-Centered Preaching by Bryan Chapell: A substantial resource on expository structure, application, and redemptive focus.
Common questions
Is expository preaching always better than topical preaching?
Not necessarily. Both can be faithful and powerful. The better approach depends on what the text or teaching need requires, not on which method carries more prestige.
Can a sermon combine expository and topical elements?
Yes. Many sermons draw on both, letting a primary passage establish the sermon while bringing in supporting texts to develop a theme.
What is the risk of topical preaching?
The main risk is imposing a predetermined point onto Scripture rather than letting the biblical texts themselves establish the argument.
Take the checklist with you
The free 5-Step Sermon Prep Checklist. One page, from blank passage to preachable outline.